Oil and Gas, MDMR and Mississippi's Public Trust


Code of JustinianThe Mississippi Department of Marine Resources is currently reviewing rules that would allow for oil and gas development in state waters to determine if they are consistent with the Mississippi Coastal Plan. This consistency review involves the management of coastal assets that fall under the public trust doctrine. The basis for the doctrine is fifteen centuries old and is given in Roman Emperor Justinian’s Institutes (2.1.1): “The air, the rivers, the sea and seashore are incapable of private ownership; they are dedicated to the use of the public.” Its rationale was, in part, that maritime trade depended on free passage between ports and on the reliable and easy use of seashores and other places to land a ship and goods.  To promote commerce and the general welfare, the sovereign held certain things for unencumbered use of citizens.

Fast forward to today. Justinian’s doctrine matured, migrated, and filtered into the legal systems of Spain, France and England and later into American Common Law. We have this doctrine in use in Mississippi case law and state regulations. The public trust gets a specific reference in the Mississippi Coastal Program’s regulation document: wetland and ecosystem preservation are favored, but specific alterations to specific wetlands and ecosystems must be in compliance with the public purposes of the public trust. (Goal 2 Chapter 1 of the MCP)

From Roman Empire times to present day Mississippi, the doctrine still has a sovereign (the Legislature) managing public assets for the use and benefit of the state’s citizens. The Legislature shares some of its regulatory power with agencies like the Department of Marine Resources (MDMR) that carry out trust duties. The MDMR consistency review now being written on the leasing and seismic testing rules is about public trust assets in the coastal zone. Does development of oil and gas under state waters fit with the management of the other valuable assets in the public trust: wetlands, ecosystems, seafood, air and water quality, natural scenic qualities (tourism), and the national interest? This analysis requires balancing economic benefit with risk of economic and ecological harm.

Justinian’s code recognized that the coastal zone merited special treatment under the law. Mississippi’s Coastal Zone is a special place and deserves resource management decisions tailored to its unique assets and setting.  It has its own set of regulations to guide these decisions.  The MDMR’s consistency review should have a hard time justifying unbridled oil and gas exploration that can directly and indirectly harm the other valuable assets in the Mississippi Sound and in state waters offshore of the barrier islands. We will soon find out how well MDMR acts as trustees over these assets. The agency’s decision will be announced before November 19th.

Andrew Whitehurst is Water Policy Director at Gulf Restoration Network.


Recent Posts

Many Americans have never heard of the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), despite the...
Written by Raleigh Hoke
Friday, 12 October 2018
The comment period closed September 6th on the “One Lake” project’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement...
Written by Andrew Whitehurst
Tuesday, 09 October 2018
Last month, the federal government filed new reports suggesting that the Taylor Energy oil leak,...
Written by Raleigh Hoke
Thursday, 04 October 2018
Gulf Restoration Network has begun a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiative that will inform...
Written by Andrew Whitehurst
Wednesday, 26 September 2018
1985 seems like a long time ago. For those who care about clean water—which is...
Written by Christian Wagley
Monday, 24 September 2018
The Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (CPRA)’s “Coastal Connections on the Water” event in...
Written by Kendall Dix
Tuesday, 18 September 2018
This article originally appeared on the blog of Marine Fish Conservation Network. It was reprinted...
Written by Kendall Dix
Friday, 31 August 2018

Latest Actions